Friday, December 17, 2010

Who is Julian Assange?

Julian Assange is an exceptionally talented and intelligent former computer “hacker” who strongly believes that governments and government departments and agencies need a lot more transparency in order to be kept in check against the excesses of abuses of power and office that so often comes with secrecy. Corruption itself is able to thrive where there is secrecy but not openness and this also applies to corporations, banks, and organisations.

Julian Assange is an Australian citizen something the Australian government and establishment media are not keen to highlight, for obvious reasons: there is an obligation to protect and assist Australian citizens, and this Aussie is being targeted by Australia's powerful military ally master, the United States government and notably the Pentagon (Department of Defence).

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Much ado about Wikileaks

THE battle for the soul of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has displaced from serious public dis-course from the scandalous revelations about Nigeria by Wikileaks. It is a website owned by Julian Assange, which burrows into the overt adventures of United States [US] in other countries.

The backdoor moves by members of the National Assembly to hijack the machinery of their parties have thrown up another major crisis in PDP, which has apparently tried to overshadow the Wikileaks report.

Two things emerge from the issues raised in the report. One is about the sovereignty of the country. The other is the quality of its leadership over the years. The two dovetail because of the concept of state, which Maclver sees as an“organisation of which government is the administrative organ.”

Wikileaks gave a graphic account of the enormous influence of the American government on Nigeria and how the Royal Dutch oil giant, Shell controls the system. It provides an insider account of the inner working of government in Nigeria, based on the whims and caprices of the US.

It is natural that no government, with a conviction that is in power, would openly admit that it had at any point in time admitted ever willingly relinquishing its powers or in part to any other country, no matter how power. Otherwise, it would not have the moral and legitimate right to be in office.

However, Nigerians know the capabilities, limits and weaknesses of our system, hence, Wikileaks merely amplified what had hitherto been discussed in hushed tones in many circle at home.
Such reports would have led to dire consequences for the local media if it had emanated from them, as the Nigerian media is treated with disdain and scorn by our local colonialists.

The scoop by the US website on Nigeria casts a slur on the integrity of our leaders, who often put their trust in leaders of other countries on critical national issues, including security, sovereignty and governance, instead of working to win the confidence, trust and understanding of their citizens.

A core Awoist, Chief Supo Sonibare, put the issue more succinctly when he situated the Wikileaks saga on the character of Nigerian leadership over the years. “Wikileaks has only confirmed the predatory nature of the leadership structure in our country. If we had worthy leaders, they would be engaging the USA and Shell in a patriotic reciprocal strategic manner. UAC was even more domineering with regard to its influence, control of the economy and contact with our founding fathers.” No foreigner can love Nigeria more than its citizens.

This principle underscores the importance the US government attaches to all its citizens wherever they reside in any part of the world. But our own foreign policy does not reflect such feelings nor actually places serious emphasis that our kind gesture to other nations must be transparently reciprocal. Besides, it does not take into account of the necessity for a sound domestic policy, which could make our independence as a sovereign state more meaningful.

The end of World War ll saw the emergence of the non-alignment movement, a concept, which though was not equated with neutrality. It was founded on the principle that other nation should not ally themselves to the defunct Soviet Union, or US in their cold war of supremacy.

Thus, their state, political, economic and social policies were to be based on domestic interests rather than on the basis of the interest of external powers. The foreign policy of a country is a weapon it deploys to influence or seeks to influence the external world based on her own domestic interest.

Furthermore, its foreign policy is dependent largely on the character of its political leadership, demographic structure, domestic reality, political structure, economy and military power.

More than 50 years after independence, we can only point at a few areas where we have been able to showcase our huge and diverse potential. These include areas of peacekeeping operations involving our military officers and men. We have failed to harness to greatness our advantage in human population and as an oil-producing nation. We are at the crossroads because of the untoward character of political leadership and its failure to build stable political institutions.

Advanced countries will continue to dictate the shape of government policies in our country, unless we take pragmatic steps towards achieving a sound economic base, stable political system. We must combine all the major instruments for implementing foreign policies like diplomacy, propaganda, militarism, and economic weapons to keep Wikileaks at bay.

Friday, October 29, 2010

Some facts about WikiLeaks

Here are some facts about WikiLeaks: * WikiLeaks says it is a non-profit organization funded by human rights campaigners, journalists and the general public. Launched in 2006, it promotes the leaking of information to fight government and corporate corruption. * In October,

WikiLeaks released 400,000 secret U.S. files on the Iraq war. The documents involved sensitive subjects including abuse of Iraqi prisoners in U.S. custody, Iraqi rights violations and civilian deaths.

* In July, it released tens of thousands of secret U.S. military documents about the war in Afghanistan, offering them first to The New York Times, Britain's Guardian newspaper and Germany's Der Spiegel.

* The Pentagon said the Afghan war documents leak -- one of the largest in U.S. military history -- had put U.S. troops and Afghan informers at risk.

* Under the heading "Afghan War Diary," the 91,000 documents collected from across the U.S. military in Afghanistan cover the war from 2004 to 2010, WikiLeaks said in a summary.

* Although founder Julian Assange has given few interviews recently, a website, www.wikileaks.org, and a Twitter feed, www.twitter.com/wikileaks, occasionally release material.

* Assange is an Australian who spends much of his time in Sweden. Earlier this year, he was accused of molestation by two women there, a charge being investigated by the Swedish prosecutor's office. A complaint about attempted rape led to an arrest warrant, but that was quickly dropped. Assange has denied all charges.

* Sweden's media laws are among the world's most protective for journalists. In addition, Sweden's Pirate Party, which advocates reform of copyright law, has agreed to host WikiLeaks' servers, giving it additional legal protection.

* WikiLeaks has no connection to the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia.